Friday, 12 September 2008

Interesting page

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DoesNotLikeMen

This rather vague phrase leads to tricky interpretation that's sometimes actively milked by the writers. Usually the assumption is that the character doesn't like machismo, or she has bad luck with men in her life, like her father or other relatives. That is, traits associated with men manifest into a dislike of men. This can pose a problem for any male lead trying to woo her, making it take much longer than suspected to win her over.
Generally, the author portrays the woman in question sympathetically, and vilifies whatever man drove her to hate the rest of his gender. Try and guess how sympathetically a man who Does Not Like Women would be portrayed. (In fact, a genderflipped version of this trope does exist, but works slightly differently — usually the man has 'no time' for love until the female lead arrives to save the day. This male version was popular in the past, but has declined in recent years for various reasons, partially because a male viewing women as 'frivolous' is likely to make him much more unsympathetic today, and partially because viewers are more likely to question his sexuality.) See Celibate Hero. (And, for younger male protagonists, Girls Have Cooties.)
Other times it's just lampshading to explain why a character isn't even seen with guys (not even offscreen), to entice shippers, or just to extend the possibilities of romantic entanglement you can put into a story. It's frequent that eventually one character comments on this and takes it in its most literal interpretation. Conversely, bifauxnen and 'mundane' lesbian characters never seem to use this trope.
Examples:
In most versions of Sailor Moon,
Rei Hino is usually completely uninterested in romance and men in general, a lot
of it coming from unresolved resentment of her
emotionally-distant father
since he abandoned her Missing Mom
during her last days, as well as her unrequited love for her father's assistant
Kaidou who married another woman. Late in the manga, when the villains torment
her with this fact, she remembers that in her past life she had actually made an oath of
chastity
to Princess Serenity and is able to fully accept this part of
herself.
Ironically, despite Rei being boy-crazy
in the animated series
, there are actually more jokes at her expense about
'not liking men.'
In Maria-sama
Ga Miteru
, Sachiko's dislike of men stems from snotty upperclass men and a
mostly uninterested fiancé. That she also goes to an all-girls school fills out
her cold but
intriguing personality
and arguably works to Yumi's advantage - but this
played up to the point she can't even be around overly masculine men without
being distressed.
One of the DVD extras makes fun
of this, when the guys are allowed to do a version of the show's opening credits
until Sachiko arrives in a conniption fit and the girls scramble to change the
scenery.
Mrs. Janet Barch in Daria hated all men
due to horrible former marriage and ensuing divorce. She eventually ends up
involved with Mr. O'Neill, a male teacher who is shy, feminine,
and sensitive
.
Webcomic example: Near the beginning of Avalon, Joe tells Ceilidh that the
unashamedly misandric Phoebe "really hates guys." Ceilidh shrugs this off until
he follows up that she "really
likes girls
," which sets off an "is she or isn't
she
" subplot that lasts throughout. (She is. In a Last Minute
Hookup
that more or less defines Strangled
By The Red String
, so is Ceilidh.)
The phrase itself isn't used in Suzumiya
Haruhi No Yuutsu
, but it's made clear with visual examples that Haruhi not
only does not like men, she considers them to be entirely beneath her notice (to
the point that she's comfortable with changing clothes in front of them). Of
course, she makes an exception for the male protagonist in the end.
This
troper took it to be less of an issue with Men themselves and more of an
attitude that People were beneath her. Her treatment of the rest of the cast
illustrates this. By the end of the series the Male Protagonist is just the only
person she actually takes seriously, and therefore stops stripping in front
of...
Susan from El Goonish
Shive
, after Susan found out that her father had an affair and her mother
justified it to her by claiming that men "can't help themselves". She eventually got over
it
after spending some time as a guy via Gender
Bender
.
Disgaea 2 inverts
this trope: Adell, the main character, "does not like girls" because of an
attempted childhood deal with a
succubus
gone south that left his face with a pair
of Inigo Montoya-style scars
and nearly killed him, giving him a rather
understandable and sympathetic reason for avoiding
them
.
Dilara in The
Assassins Of Tamurin
, due to being abused by the son of the foster family
she lived with before being taken in by Makina Seval. The Despotana eventually
uses this to manipulate her into "willingly" joining her Amazon
Brigade
at Three Springs.
Akane Tendo from Ranma 1/2:
Being attacked by all of the boys at school every morning because they think they have to
defeat you to have a chance to date you
can do this. After being chosen to
marry Ranma:
Nabiki: "Well... you hate boys, don't you?"
Kasumi: "So
you're in luck! He's half
girl!
"
Hinako Aikawa, the lead female character in the manga Bitter
Virgin
, is unsettled by being around men and flinches if one happens to
touch her — she is (at first) totally repelled by men due to the huge trauma of
having been constantly raped by her
stepfather
and impregnated twice, even giving birth once and having to give
the child in adoption, all before high school. Ouch. (And guess who the lead
guy, Daisuke, has to fall for?)
Katchoo in Strangers In Paradise. Since she is also a lesbian this leads
her to be described as a rampant Straw
Feminist
and bull dyke by unsympathetic characters. But since she was raped
by her stepfather as a teenager and received nothing but hassle from men you
can't really blame her.
This troper disagrees. Yes you can blame her. She is
an abusive jerkass and the line David spouts about 'at least it's your fists
beating me' has to be the most sickening portrayal of 'abuse as romance' that
this troper has ever seen. If she was a
male character
, she would be cut
no slack by anyone
.
Sakurako Tenmaru from Ai Kora is known
for being "stingy" toward men, stemming from an incident in middle school, where
her friends turned on her because all the boys fell for her, though through no
machinations on her part.
Dr. Luisa "Lu" Delgado from Strong Medicine. She
sometimes treats the men in her life (no matter if they're her love intrests or
not) real bad whether they're jerks or not, and that turns even worse after she's raped by a
colleague
and becomes a whiny Straw
Feminist
. Sure, she did have crappy experiences, but not all men (and rich
people ) are scum just because you say so, honey.
Galaxy Angel
Rune
's Apricot Sakuraba plays this trope in an unusual sense; she can
interact with men without difficulty, but if a man touches her, her
super-strength kicks in and she literally reflexively kicks the man's ass.
Beatrice and Katherine in Much Ado
About Nothing
and The Taming
Of The Shrew
are notorious man-haters. Although Beatrice is not so much a
"Man Hater" as a "Benedict Hater."
One of the initial defining traits of
Kate on Misfile is that
she can't stand to have any guy claim to be the best on any track she races.
She's raced and beat every man to make such a claim ever since her sister was
killed in a racing accident caused by chavanistic male drivers.
In Mahou Sensei
Negima
, Nodoka seems to have mild case of androphobia (well exaggerated in the
anime
), and an early manga bio states that she "dislikes men". However, this
seems to be do to the fact that she's extremely shy to begin with, and, being a
student at an all-girls school, has very limited experience with men. She seems
to be getting over it though, thanks to a massive crush on Negi.
Love Hina also
had this in the form of Motoko (at least early on, until she started falling for
Keitaro), and at one point she's mistaken for a lesbian by a disguised Kanako.
Who then proceeds to try and molest her.
Nao Yuuki
from Mai-Hime is a teen prostitute who uses her CHILD to rob and injure the men
who call her up for dates, taking advantage of their lust for her. She's been
doing so after a gang killed her father and left her mother (and more important
person) comatose.
Husky the fish-boy, from the manga +Anima is, admittedly,
only like thirteen years old, but he still doesn't care much for girls. Maybe
it's because he was forced to crossdress to make a meager living for longer than
he'd care to say, or maybe because of a rough experience with an all-girl gang
in one of the early chapters (where he lost his most prized possession), but
when the bat-girl Nana tried to join the group, he objected rather violently,
and said that he hates girls. He eventually softened up... a little. But he
still gives Nana grief for being "such a girl" despite being very, very girly
himself, and so feminine that he's frequently mistaken for a girl by women and
men alike.
Katherine, the titular shrew in Shakespeare's
Taming of the Shrew (and Kat in its update, 10 Things I Hate About You) is
sharp-tongued, bad-tempered, and bitchy to pretty much everyone, until she is
tamed by Petruchio (and his counterpart, Patrick Verona).
In Kiss Me Kate,
the character even gets a musical number called "I Hate Men".
Psycho Mantis
from Metal Gear
Solid
does not like women. In his incarnation in The Last
Days Of Foxhound
this dislike is flanderized
into describing all women as 'whorebags' and a violent reaction to being
approached by them — at one point he would rather fall to his death than let
Sniper Wolf pull him to safety.
Inverted in Fate Stay
Night
with Issei, who is afraid of women, and thinks that one of the female
leads is pure evil.
Another inversion was Yamcha from the first Dragonball
episodes. Here it's not that he dislikes women, but is terrified of girls,
despite his wish to get a girlfriend. In fact, he wants the Dragonballs to get
over his phobia.
Survival
Of The Fittest
's answer to this trope is Melina Frost. Heck, she founds a
group with the sole objective of wiping out the male competition on the island.
The portrayal isn't at all sympathetic: she comes across as a raging,
psychopathic misandrist. It's worth noting that some believe she is a Flanderization
of her handler, who while sane and not at all violent appears to be equally
misandristic, talking to the male members of the board as if they were dogs at
the very least.
Leo, a former Giant Mook who
underwent a psuedo Heel Face
Turn
in the Western Shojo manga Miriam,
dislikes women so much he's practically enraged when one so much as talks to
him. Miriam constructs an elaborate imaginary backstory for him that, in her
mind, would excuse his behavior, which involves several groups of women (his
sisters, his female co-workers, his sisters-in-law, etc.) taking advantage of
him for his entire life. While her story is farfetched, his attempts at
explaining himself, which amount to "they're noisy, and if you deal with them,
they cry, and you still can't fight them..." suggest something along those lines
might've actually happened to him, even though he's never been married and
doesn't have any sisters.
Here's a male example for you: Peaceable Sherwood
of The Sherwood Ring by Elizabeth Marie Pope. His uncle/guardian got him
enlisted as a soldier during the Revolutionary War (on the Brit side)
specifically because Peaceable "refused to marry the half-wit he had selected
for me." When his uncle pointed out that acting like a half-wit was the fashion
for young ladies of the time, Peaceable said he'd rather die single, and refused
to marry until he met a woman as intelligent as he was. In a Crowning
Moment Of Awesome
, the sister of the soldier he's taken prisoner tricks him
into drinking sleeping drops (that he knows she has on her at the time because
(a) he saw them and (b) she even mentioned them in conversation!) because he
finds it all too easy to believe that a woman would be dumb enough to try to
pull that off. When he realizes what she's done after the drinking, he promptly
proposes marriage before passing out!
For whatever reason (an explanation or
even allusion to one has not yet materialized), Stunt from Dominic
Deegan
really, really does not like women.
Miss Havisham from Great
Expectations
. After getting jilted at the alter by a conman, she spent the
rest of her life in her wedding dress (to remind her of what had happened)
training her adopted daughter Estelle to hate men as well, inititially to
protect her from them, but subsequently with the intent of using her to break men's
hearts
as revenge. Which is where Pip comes in...
The first Red Adept of
the Apprentice
Adept
series. Stile uses this to cause an Engineered
Public Confession
.
Red was so
widely misconstrued
as a bad lesbian
stereotype
that Piers Anthony deliberately introduced a sympathetic lesbian
character in a later volume. Which, in turn, made it look like he was just
covering his ass.

Sunday, 22 June 2008

Movie Philosophy

Overview

I am not going to bother rambling on for hours about how Western societies are plagued by misandry in many different forms, the media being the most conspicuous. I will assume that you are fairly aware of these issues and are reading my film reviews for your own interest or because you are hoping to find out if a movie you are planning on seeing will annoy you because of potential misandry.

If you are like me and you are completely sick of the increasing anti-male messages of movies in today's "Goldenage" of Hollywood or independant film alike, then you'd definetly want a second opinion before you watch it. Or maybe before your child watches it perhaps.

My Aim

If you are looking for very brief movie reviews with minimal spoilers then you are out of luck here. These sites spring to mind and are well worth visiting:

http://www.mensmovieguide.com/

This site has quite a varied number of films to choose from and the ones that are underlined have brief reviews written by either the site owner or people who send their reviews in (I do it quite a lot) and is probably your best bet to find out quickly if a film is anti-male or not.

http://home.earthlink.net/~jamiranda/mramovies/id2.html

This is also a good site that looks at particular films in more detail and as such has a way of looking at movies similar to my own.

I will try and warn of spoilers if possible but understand that if there are already a couple of sites that accomplish the basic purpose of warning of male-bashing then I would simply be competing with those sites and there would be little opportunity for me to really rant about a movie and discover in detail its message etc. For that is just what I intend to do.

I am really looking to analyse movies in more detail from my own perspective and you may be surprised by my views.

Your help needed

Like I said, all movies I review will be from my own unique perspective which is critical of gender relations and of course I would appreciate it immensely if you would send me your own reviews of movies I have or have not reviewed and I will add them in the comments section. I want this site to eventually become a huge archive for men's perspectives on movies and a wide diversity of opinions would be very well recieved.

Before you send reviews to my email address, I will give you an example of how I think when reviewing movies in its simplest form.
  • Male responsibility versus female rights. Men dying in war to earn their right to be loved and respected e.g. Saving Private Ryan to boys having to go through journeys to be loved by their mothers e.g. AI; versus women not having to earn such things. While this is is male positivity, know that I am for equal rights BUT only if there is equal responsibility. You will see what I mean
  • Children's movies will be critiqued most harshly because I personally believe that movies have the greatest impact on children due to their quick developing brains and response to new stimuli. Disney films for instance and the messages that come with them. The Spiderwick Chronicles is an anti-male movie because of its approach on fatherhood and its potential influence on children watching it.
  • Adult movies like Pulp Fiction, Tarantino and Sly Stallone movies which may have certain aspects of percieved male positivity will not necessarily be considered male-positive. I cannot stand mindless violence where a "scorned" (yes it applies to men too) male character destroys a group of evil men to save a woman or for his own revenge or both.
  • You will find my stance on woman bashing to be quite counterintuitive at times. The Pianist and Hard Candy, regardless of what they were actually intended to preach to the audience i.e. woman good even when shes bad but man bad; can actually be seen as misoygnistic in my view. You'll see
  • Length of review will depend on tons of factors. How I personally feel about the movie, like how it affected me, how good it is for a topic on gender issues, how well known it is etc. And I will try to outline the plot at the start of the review and after the spoiler sign, go straight into it
  • If the film is big and there are tons of similar minded reviews all over the internet then I may insert one of them into the review and critique it

Reviewing Movies

Send your reviews to my email address here. Don't worry if I have already made a review of the movie you are writing a review for - just send it and I'll add it to the comments section.

Preferable structure of review:

  • Title + Year
  • Introduction/Plot Outline
  • Good + Bad movie wise
  • Stance on Gender
  • Conclusion
  • Certificate, Runtime

You don't have to follow this exactly - balls in your court. In fact when I add my own review for the movie in question I'll have already added the certificate and plot so you can just go straight into the issues you want to discuss!

Saturday, 21 June 2008

Teeth



TEETH (2007)





OVERVIEW:

Teeth is about a teenage girl called Dawn who is a virgin and discovers she has a mutation in her vagina which causes it to grow teeth. She is her school's spokesperson for the chastity group and lives with her step parents and psychotic stepbrother who along with the majority of the men in the movie want nothing more than to nail this nubile chick. Well I think you know enough now.

SPOILERS ALERT

Does anyone think that making a movie about a man with a penis that shoots acid into the vaginas of bitchy or skanky women is funny? God diggers perhaps. The bros on some of the forums came up with some very novel scenarios. One anonymous reckoned a movie should be made about a man whose dick releases molten lead into the mouth of gold diggers. Alas the title name Iron Man is taken. Acid Head was an amusing one too. Oh and the one about the comedy with an evil space alien that looks like a male human and has a member that works like a flamethrower when he wants it to. How would the feminists react to the scenes where he screws some earth babe and because he thinks its amusing, blasts her twat with flames. Or her ass or mouth or whatever. Would they laugh at the "dark comedy" like they would at the scenes in Teeth? Well equality appears to be going down a oneway street with women's name on it here.

If you want one indication that our society suffers from a highly concentrated abundance of sick perverted women and manginas then you really need not look any further. You may have noticed that over the years Western women have become obsessed with this disgusting and bloody evil fascination with the idea of male castration. The severing of the penis and or testicles. The woman who finds these connotations of violence as disgusting as those who opposed the Klu Klux Klan do are the exception it would seem. Most Western women (W/W), our mothers, sisters, daughters, wives and whatever will laugh at the idea of their fellow human beings suffering a fate which in all brutal honesty is a degree of atrocity above rape.

I think that there are many messages in all films regardless of how hard the director tries to hide it but there is always one core idea which is going through his or her mind. Teeth is about emasculation. It uses the absolutely most violent physical act of misandry to do this. And it is a reflection of the women of this society's hatred of the male gender. And the poor mangina who made this movie not only knew this but wanted to exploit it to appeal to women.

You may or may not sense my helplessness in trying to explain how angry all this nonsense is making me. In answer to my question: Would the destruction of women's breasts or genitals for the purpose of public amusement ever be accepted to the point where comedy/horror movies are made about it? Well I think thats a rhetorical question. Don't you? Violence against women is never acceptable. If a man ever commits it for whatever reason and whatever intensity it is always done in such a way that puts shame on the man. Even then feminists will scream misogyny, even when in the vast majority of those cases, some pussy-whipped machismo Captain-Save-A-Ho gallops in to her rescue.

In this "Cautionary tale for men" virtually all the male characters were shown to be immoral or evil on some level with the only two exceptions (the father and some male friend of a male character) being static characters. The female victim/heroine lead, Dawn (portrayed by Jess Weixler who has no shame) is a hardcore advocate of abstinance and preaches to little kids that sex is wrong before marriage. One of the messages of the movie, apparantly, is the defiance of the ideal of abstinance funnily enough. The vagina is scraped out in the sex education textbook indicating what I understood to be 1950s America where values are shall we say, different to what they are now?

Nice guys as usual are demonised in a way the classic bad boys women go for in real life never have. Some fellow abstinance nerd becomes insane with lust and tries to rape Dawn and we are treated to a horrifying image of his severed penis on the ground and the stump in his groin where it once was. A lecherous gynecologist gets his hand torn off and another geeky boyfriend who turns out to be a wanker who bet on the vagina dentata infected woman breaking her abstinence pledges gets his gory 'comeuppance'. A considerably more gory and shocking display of violated male genitals and a chorus of female giggling in the theatre followed.

The worst part was the psychotic half brother who wants nothing more than to screw Dawn and at the start of the movie even young boys aren't free from negative stereotyping of males as perverted monsters when the two siblings are children and the brother wants to see her genitals only to get bitten. Later when Dawn chews off his rocket near the end of the film, the brother's pet rotweiller snacks on it. Just about every age group of males has been demonised by this point and at the end Dawn now turns into a man-hating serial rapist as it implies with her coy smirk that she intends to maul some lecherous old man who locks her in his car.

Its blatantly honest that Teeth is pro-feminist with all this talk of 'male fear' of female sexuality through the ancient fear of vagina dentata (Latin for toothed vagina). The female victim is also a heroine who uses her vagina to dominate the penis when the usual idea is that men are stronger than women etc. Some highly twisted and misandric version of the Adam vs. Lillith story and women winning the battle of the sexes. Disgusting. It sounds like I am overanalysing the movie too much but that is what must be done when trying to underline the motive of such an anti-male and sick form of 'entertainment.' Who knows? Maybe the day men stop killing men who rape women comes women really will become 'empowered' and start raping men with their vagina dentata! Incidently there was a lot of talk of selling out spiked walls for women's vaginas in South Africa. But seriously - do you think a man will just run around screaming after you have 'defended yourself' from him? No he is probably going to try and kill you.

Many films which one associates with potential misandry at first thought include The Pianist on the the lighter extreme and Hard Candy on the stronger but this film alone undisputably ranks as one of the most misandric, anti-male films ever created and this is shown with such little subtlety that it is hard to imagine anyone missing it. You'd be surprised of course.
Apparantly many reviews not only in most magazines but also IMDB don't think so. The ones who rated this movie most highly appear to be under 18 females. Shock shock horror horror! Let's see what Digitalspy had to say for instance:

Director: Mitchell Lichtenstein Time: 93 mins Certificate: 18
As the living embodiment of the vagina dentata myth, it was inevitable that Teeth's protagonist Dawn (Jess Weixler), a chipper high school chastity group leader, wouldn't remain abstinent for very long. As she embarks on a blossoming romance with new boy Tobey (Hale Appleman), her initial resistance becomes a source of frustration to him. It is in a secluded cave - where Tobey decides to force himself on Dawn - that the film's titular teeth take their first horrific bite.

From then we follow the sexually-awakened lead character as she encounters a series of unpleasant men who try to take advantage of her apparent naivety. Dawn's creepy gynecologist (Josh Pais), nerdy classmate Ryan (Ashley Simpson) and even stepbrother Brad - a memorable, scenery-chewing performance from John Hensley - are all destined for a comeuppance.

Squirm inducing and hilarious in equal measure, Teeth may carry a bizarre premise but, like all good B-movies should, it successfully pushes the boundaries of acceptable taste. Working on multiple levels, Teeth ticks boxes as a '50s, Roger Corman-style exploitation throwback, an unnerving psychological horror and a satire on middle-American values.

The film has been floating around in UK release limbo for some time (perhaps in part due to uncertainty on how to best market it) after initially making waves at the Sundance Film Festival in 2007. Its trailers pitch it as a teen horror film, however it operates more potently as a dark comedy. Granted its humour is about as jet-black as you can get, but it fits more aptly into that genre than any other.

At times it's as traumatic a watch for male viewers as 2005's Hard Candy, yet sets itself apart from David Slade's film by being less direct, that little bit more playful. Knowing full well that his story strains plausibility, writer/director Mitchell Lichtenstein's script is self-aware, offering knowing winks to the audiences and diffusing gruesome lacerations with humour ("I'm not going to bit ya!" remarks the doomed gynecologist Dr. Godfrey.)

Leading lady Jess Weixler gives a standout turn as Dawn, capably taking the character from do-gooder to deadly Lolita. It's the kind of performance she may have trouble shaking off but one that has no doubt opened a lot of doors for her.

Teeth is an impressive first feature from actor-turned-filmmaker Lichtenstein. As the son of legendary pop artist Roy Lichtenstein, it's a little disappointing that he utilises such a drab colour palette. Though his opening Hitchcock-evoking scene - an establishing pan across the suburban setting for the story, accompanied by dramatic Bernard Hermann-like strings - shows that he's inherited his father's knack for image composition.

A lack of visual dynamism is a minor quibble considering how enjoyable the rest of the film is - yet Teeth shot with the urgency and vigour that Sam Raimi injected into his Evil Dead series could have made it even better.

Nevertheless, the film is smartly written, inventive and wickedly funny.
Wrapping men's intimacy anxieties around a girl empowerment parable, Teeth is full of surprises, cunningly flipping genre stereotypes and defying expectations. While probably too lurid and graphic for the mainstream's tastes, it's one of those films that has a genuine shot at acquiring cult classic status.

That is basically what your country thinks of you as a man. The demonisation of men in Teeth will only amplify the damage done the relationships between men and women - nice or bad boys. It speaks for itself. Its almost counter-intuitive. You'd think women would go for nice guys because the bad boys are more or less garuanteed to be creeps when of course we know why they go for them in reality. Teeth seems to show exactly what women collectively think of nice guys. Well at least one good message of this movie is not to be a niceguy! Either way this movie will be used against women in the future.


Rated R for disturbing sequences involving sexuality and violence, language and some drug use.
Runtime:88 min
IMDB

1/4




Very interesting comments!

Monday, 9 April 2007

Amazing Grace

Amazing Grace (2007)







It took a lot of convincing for me to see this movie. I deciphered from the name ‘Amazing Grace’ which is a well known Christian hymn what this movie was about. I have to admit the connotations of ‘abolition of slavery’ ensued me picturing the demonisation of white men, mostly in positions of power in the realm of Parliament or the slave ship, and the unspeakable inhumanity suffered by the Africans. There is no doubt that the Africans as a group were subject to such hellishness but I know that they were not the only group that were oppressed as slavery was not a Black exclusive problem and also I am finding the whole ‘Whites must pay for evils inflicted upon blacks by white ancestors’ cries to be quite tiresome. But what I saw was something quite different.


Set in the 18th century Britain, Michael Apted’s movie is about the campaign against the slave trade and the famous abolitionist, William Wilberforce (played very well by Ioan Gruffudd) who after wrestling with his illness and his future and seeing with his eyes the abhorrent activities underway in the West Indies, is determined to grab the British Parliament by the horns and put an end to the slave trade altogether. Amazing Grace is what can be called “a quintessential historical biopic.” We have also fantastic performances by Richard Bailey, Albert Finney, Michael Gambon, Romola Garai, Rufus Sewell, Nick Thomas Webster and Youssou N'Dour.

SPOILER BEGIN

During the film we see Wilberforce’s poignant story being told to his future wife and the future Prime Minister and best friend, William Pitt (played to excellence with great power by Benedict Cumberbatch), keeping him on track by persuading him and others to take on the extremely dangerous and taboo issue of the British Slave Trade. Wilberforce faces relentless pressure by many factors including his illness, his unpopularity in the House of Commons, his love of naturalism and his frustration at his inability to change anything. In the government. Throughout the movie, Wilberforce’s enormous, inspirational inner strength propels him to towards his goal with a passion that words cannot describe.
This movie did not need to constantly bombard us with consistent, horrific imagery of the African’s suffering on the slave ships etc. – the words which came from the mouths of grievously remorseful former captains of the British expeditions and trades etc. amplified it in a far more powerful way and really showed the humanity of the people regardless of their status and the colour of their skin. I was worried they would simply show all the white people as complacent, even greedy slave drivers – which of course they were more often than not though I am sure a substantial proportion of Brits were secretly against the slave trade – but they instead showed that the slavery was more about the struggle for survival. A cruel method of survival with the age old violation of equality and the ambition of the British Empire I thought was not above using whatever it had at its disposal to conquer the world. Yes they faced threats from the French – the survival excuse here – and that shows the cruelty of it blatantly. Not that they showed it as the movie was dominated by politicians, but the majority of British Citizens I have heard were also against the slave trade – and that is a far greater number than the people in power. This movie showed the heat of the battle at the top.
Gruffudd’s Wilberforce in spite of his pressures which were monumental, was evidently a very strong man who was genuinely abhorrent of the atrocities being fired at the Africans and his performance along with the great cast of positively portrayed male characters made me literally glow during the movie and by the end of it I was blown away. The theme of friendship and comradeship and its significance in teamwork and motivation really moved me as well. The relationship of honesty and faith between Pitt and Wilberforce was one of the best performances I have seen in a long time. The wife was likeable (and very good looking) and supportive of him all the way after their many intellectually stimulating conversations. Wilberforce, despite being a man of high power (whom are stereotyped as talking only to other men of power as equals) being an animal lover (with his house full of rabbits etc. was a campaigner of the abolition of cruelty to animals) and a champion of freedom of justice and would talk to anyone regardless of rank – his cook for instance – as an equal. In fact save a few (and even they turn good in the end as men do more often than not after intellectual defeat) all the men in the movie are portrayed as very human and strong people. There is virtually no violence at all save the odd scenes of foggy African slaves in turmoil. There was one strong individual called Equiano who showed us the chains etc. and was present in the Wilberforce’s meetings.

This movie made me feel proud to be a man and one of a just mindset who will sacrifice all that he holds dear for the right reasons. And that is not about war or saving women and children from sinking ships but about saving his fellow human beings and improving humanity to the best it can be. I couldn’t help compare this movie to today’s situation regarding the fourth class (after animals) status of men in the West. The slave trade was something that people had become desensitised to. As if it was normal. Something that was taboo to speak against or bring up. It just was. The majority of citizens secretly loathed it and knew something no matter what that might be was not right and eventually someone with balls of steel challenged it. He was shut up, then ridiculed then taken seriously and finally accepted. Will the current silence of men ever follow such a journey? Will the most taboo – the most repulsive of all subjects namely male vulnerability and the silence of men – finally be analysed with a telescope capable of penetrating through the clouds of feminism and political correctness? There are a growing number of men and women who are variably aware of something invisible and toxic. Misandry - the hate that dare not speak its name. Who will speak out against it? It could be you. Someone who is an inspiration to all men. Someone like William Wilberforce as depicted in Amazing Grace.

SPOILER END

In conclusion this was a refreshing and extremely gripping and excellent movie about the spirit of man and justice. When the bill was finally passed a member of Parliament said something along the lines of “When we think of strong men we think of the likes of Napoleon. Seldom do we hear of strong men who are peaceful. William Wilberforce is such a man.” This couldn’t be more true. It is something the radical Black leaders and of course feminists have forgotten because we never hear about it. If you are a white male do not feel guilty for what your ancestors may or may not have done. You had nothing to do with it.

For thematic material involving slavery, and some mild language.
Runtime: 118Min (UK) 111Min (US)
3.5/4


Saturday, 7 April 2007

Sunshine


Sunshine (2007)







After seeing a trailer for this movie involving awesome solar rays and fire and giant spacecrafts and little previous experience of space movies since the likes of Armageddon and Apollo 13, I found Sunshine to be quite intriguing. Enough to draw my attention away from Mr. Bean’s Holiday for sure.


This movie, directed by Danny Boyle (28 Days Later, Trainspotter, Shallow Grave) is set in 2057 and our sun, Sol, is dying out. Apparently it has not yet swelled up into a red giant and begun consuming all the inner planets which is what happens when all the hydrogen is turned into helium as far as I know. Either way it doesn't make sense. A change as radical as that would take millions of years. Anyway, it has just ceased to function. It has been 7 years since Icarus, the spacecraft sent with a team of scientists to deliver a nuclear bomb to re-ignite the earth has been lost and so Icarus 2 has been sent to replace it. It is 18 months into the mission and the crew of eight, 36 million miles from their target must finish the job.

This movie was not an easy watch. It was exhilarating and gripping but also overwhelming and painful throughout. The cgi is spot on (frankly I am not spitting like a cobra at cgi when it does what it intended to do - thats just me) nd the spacecraft very impressive and the techno rock music worked well. The cast is a part Asian and part Western crew which suggested to me the future idea of power sharing between countries. We have the captain Kaneda (Hiroyuki Sanada) who is pretty underdeveloped as a character, the navigator Trey (Benedict Wong), the physicist and central character Capa (Cillian Murphy), the biologist Corazon (Michelle Yeoh), the American engineer Mace (Chris Evan), the American communications officer Harvey (Troy Garity), the medical officer Searle (Cliff Curtis) and the pilot Cassie (Rose Byrne).

SPOILER BEGIN

As well as bright and stunning interstellar action sequences there are issues of psychological and social drama which for the first 2/3 of the movie has quite an interesting and tense atmosphere. We see the relationships between the characters – the rivalry between the charismatic Capa and the aggressive Mace and the hinted sexual tension between Capa and the female pilot Cassie. I definitely think that the captain should have had some more development and the doctor too whom we see watching the sun at the start with fascination. The inevitable sequence of writing off each character could have been done better – the demises themselves were inventive enough but you wouldn’t expect the captain to be killed off so quickly just when we were getting to know him. On the plus side I really felt the devastation Trey felt at forgetting to adjust the shields properly and consequently causing a huge dilemma – rendezvous with the Icarus 1 from which a faint signal had been sent or continue with the mission with a very low chance of success. Realising you have failed mankind and having every person on the ship know it must be truly terrifying and Wong’s character portrayed this frighteningly well and though his fate was hardly surprising, it nonetheless shocked me to the core.

Then I found things getting very confusing. My guess is that it alternates between virtual reality involving a crew member from the last Icarus - who appears to have mutated as a result of his isolation and gone mad – and the final attempt to see the mission through and power up the sun again to save humanity. I really felt that in the last part the movie started to go down hill and it didn’t feel right - the whole supernatural god idea. While I am sure it was an interesting and 'bright' (sorry couldn't resist) set of ideas I really felt that a simpler and more understandable ending would have been fitting.

Sunshine reminded me of Apollo 13 in more ways than one. Being a space movie, Apollo 13 was a movie made for men as a chick flick is made for women. It was about a true story of a group of intelligent and highly dedicated men who despite having to fight for their survival, manage to solve near impossible problems and do so with the very essence of male friendship and teamwork. Sunshine evolved from Apollo 13 in that the cgi was exponentially sexed up and the special effects etc. The mission had great potential for intelligent problem solving and what’s more than that, great potential for a prime example of the excellence of men when it comes to being the keepers of judgement of humanity for the good or bad – in this case good or salvation.

But it was not to be.

Sunshine takes a step back when it comes to the portrayal of men – in terms of sympathy for example. While their thunder is not necessarily stolen by the two female characters, the men in this film as not given a very positive image. In Apollo 13 the men managed to work as a team and get past all the anger that was caused by the challenges, tense situations and especially sacrifice.

In this movie the men are fighting over who will survive and seem to hate each other, making resentful comments and getting into fights over the most trivial matters and eventually the most important matters. The extremely potent teamwork and friendship as seen in Apollo 13 would be far more likely that what we see in this movie.

Early on in the film we see the central man, Capa break into a childish fight with Mace over a trivial thing and Cassie, the one of the two woman who I did not like, uttered the typical: “We have an outbreak of manliness,” or something along these lines – showing women as the mature, grown up professionals who are sick of these 'boys with toys.' It was a completely unnecessary thing to say and was really petty and intruding. If the world was threatened by the sun I am nearly 100 percent sure there would be no women on such a voyage – they’d be considered far too valuable and be protected at all costs on the planet. This is what makes this movie in spite of all its realism backed up by cgi, obvious fantasy.

Cassie herself was unnecessary. She mocked all the things men stand for and risk their lives for with all of their creative ‘testosterone.’ She contributes little compared to the other characters, conveniently being the pilot so as she is in expendable compared to the male characters and her pessimism and whining at times made her more of a liability than an asset. She was the typical politically correct ‘decoration’ and violation of men’s territories. The way she said goodbye, we love you to the medical doctor who volunteers to leave himself behind was so devoid of emotion and fake. The whole romance idea between her and Capa is a very bad one for a space mission where lives are risked and chivalry can make spontaneous irrational decisions capable of overwriting the importance of saving mankind. I am not saying women should not be allowed into space movies no questions asked – just not to make her role so annoying. Michelle Yeoh’s character was tolerable enough – she is professional enough and even likeable. I also knew that since Capa was the most charismatic and that he was quite intimate with Cassie that he would be the last to survive. I could never tell what order the others would die (other than the first would be male) but I knew he would be the one to reflect on his life in the last 20min of the movie. They were all tall, young and Hollywood movie star look-alikes when the crew aboard a real spacecraft on a real mission like this one would be older and far more experienced, but again we can tell the good guys from the bad. The ones that were assholes all died with little punch behind it other than interesting methods of death e.g. Ghostship airlock breaking. The man who is not or is least an asshole i.e. is liked by the female characters is always the most likely to survive.

SPOILER END

Overall this movie was ok but not great. It had potential to be excellent and I am not just talking about the failure of the last part to satisfy. I am talking about something very important to me and how even a small dosage of feminist influence/political correctness can ruin my movie. Its like the poison of a black mamba. Had it been shorter with a better finale and the pointless fighting between the male characters and the 'comment' by the woman removed, I would have given this a much higher score, held back only by its diffculty to watch. A good movie though that is worth watching if you are into the sci-fi space genre.



For violent content and language.

Runtime: 107min

IMDB

2/4